Final Exam FRQ
- Due No Due Date
- Points 50
- Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
- Available Nov 29, 2021 at 12am - Dec 5, 2021 at 11:59pm
Assignment Guidelines:
FRQ Directions Download FRQ Directions
Rubric:
Category |
12.5 (Expert) |
10 (Professional) |
8.75 (Thinker) |
7.5 (Advanced Beginner) |
6.25 (Novice) |
Organization and Level of Detail |
Information is well organized and structured. Response is written in complete sentences and addresses all parts of the case study questions in order. The first response provides abundant and accurate evidence for the primary diagnosis/es. It includes at least two additional differential diagnoses (in addition to the primary diagnosis). Specific examples from the case study are used to support the diagnosis. |
Information is well organized and structured. Response is written in complete sentences and addresses all parts of the case study questions in order. The evidence provided for the differential diagnosis and the primary diagnosis is not entirely accurate. The student's reasoning has some minor issues/explanations that need to be clearer. Specific examples from the case study are used to support the diagnosis. Some key details are missing to receive full credit, but it’s close. |
Information is organized but sentences are not as detailed as they could be. Question responses are missing some crucial details/ differential diagnosis is not well thought out. The primary diagnosis is incorrect/reasoning does not connect with diagnosis/reasoning is not well thought out or explained. Specific examples from the case study are used to back up the diagnosis but key details are missing. |
Information is not organized. Response is written in fragmented /incomplete sentences or bullet points. Not all questions are addressed. There is not enough detail /not enough examples from the case study to explain why students made diagnosis or support the differential diagnosis. Student’s reasoning is unclear. |
Information is disorganized. The connection between the case study questions and responses are not clear. Student makes a diagnosis but does not explain their reasoning for it or does not use specific examples from the case study. |
Quality of Content |
Information clearly relates to the prompt. Each section includes several supporting details /examples from the case study and each point and idea is well thought out. Student demonstrate understanding of the proposed diagnosis thorough differential diagnosis and explanations supporting the diagnosis and socio-cultural considerations and treatment. | Information clearly relates to the prompt. Each section is answered in complete sentences and shows some details/examples from the case study. Student demonstrates that they understand the diagnosis. |
Information clearly relates to the prompt. Few details and/or examples are given. Student shows limited ability to make connections between case study, diagnosis, and explanation for diagnosis. |
Information is sparse and is not closely tied to the requirements of the prompt. |
Information is clearly lacking. |
Application |
All questions are addressed in sufficient detail using complete sentences. That demonstration an integration of knowledge of mental illness, socio-cultural factors and treatments. |
All questions are addressed, but some points are not explained or sufficiently unpacked. |
Nearly all questions were addressed but not in sufficient detail. |
Response is missing crucial details to show that the student understands the case. One of the three questions was not addressed. |
More than one question was not addressed. |
Delivery and Mechanics |
Nearly no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. |
Few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. |
Some noticeable grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors. |
Grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors make it difficult to read the responses. |
Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|
Organization and Level of Detail
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
||
Quality of Content
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
||
Application
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
||
Delivery and Mechanics
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
||
Total Points:
50
out of 50
|